Listen to advice and accept instruction so that you may gain wisdom for the future.
The human mind may devise many plans but it is the purpose of the
Lord that will be established. —Proverbs
19:20-21
The Jerusalem Council debates the "Gentile Issue." As depicted in stained glass at the Cathedral of St. Helena, Helena, MT Photo Credit: Jeff Gardner |
As the Message of Jesus began to spread beyond Jerusalem issues began to arise. Jesus was of course Jewish, and all of his
original followers were Jewish. However,
in the decades following Jesus’ death and resurrection, believers began to
“take heat” for practicing their faith.
Some of the Apostles (e.g., Philip) were forced to flee Jerusalem, but they
took with them their new way of living.
It didn’t take long before non-Jews were attracted to the way of Jesus.
The good news is the church starts to grow exponentially,
but with that growth comes new challenges. Prior to this, the Church has been
almost 100% Jewish, but now non-Jews are starting to become “Christians.” How should they integrate these new believers
into the church? Do they need to be circumcised before they can be baptized—i.e.,
do they have to “become Jewish” before they “become Christian?” It was an issue
that polarized the leadership of the young church. (Luke presents his version of these events in Acts 15 and Paul gives another
perspective in his letters—e.g., Galatians
2:1-14.)
The man who would become the Apostle Paul had an encounter
with the risen Lord on the Damascus Road
that turned one of the faith’s greatest enemies into its greatest advocate. Barnabas, called “the Encourager,” went “out
on a limb” for Paul when he first came to Jerusalem, and bought him before the
Apostles. Paul disappears from the story
for a while; we aren’t sure why. Some
say he was in seclusion while others say he went on a failed mission to Arabia. Whatever the reason, after three years, Paul
returns to Antioch and he and Barnabas are “set apart” for a special mission to
the Gentiles. Together, these two
friends embark on a mission to take the message to the non-Jewish world. Paul and Barnabas would have represented the
more “liberal” view that God-believers did not have to be circumcised before
they could be part of the fellowship.
Meanwhile, the faction back in Jerusalem, including Peter,
James, and John, is much more “conservative.”
As we noted above, the Church in Jerusalem is a much more homogeneous
population mainly comprised of Jews, so the question of circumcision never
really came up—at first. But little by
little, these “pillars of the church” begin to hear the stories of what is
taking place beyond the boarders of Jerusalem in Samaria and beyond, and are
intrigued, and, probably a little afraid, of the new Spirit winds that seem to be blowing through the Church.
Then, Peter himself has a powerful experience of the Spirit. Peter
is in Joppa when he has a vision that
opens his mind and spirit to new possibilities. Simultaneously, in Caesarea, a
man named Cornelius has an encounter in which he is compelled to summon Peter
to his home. Peter complies and goes to
Cornelius’ home—and the stage is set for the Spirit’s next move.
As Cornelius explains the remarkable circumstances that led
him to summon Peter to his home, Peter finally puts all the pieces together. He realizes what God was trying to
communicate through his vision. No one
is unclean in God’s eyes—no one is
excluded from God’s Kingdom! Gentiles
should no longer be denied access to the fellowship. Even before he can finish proclaiming his
revelation, the Holy Spirit falls upon the group assembled in a similar manner
to what happened in Jerusalem on Pentecost. Peter is obviously moved by the Gentile Pentecost experience and returns
to Jerusalem to share it. Even the most
“conservative” of the Apostles are forced to admit, however begrudgingly, that:
“God has given even to the Gentiles the
repentance that leads to life.”
Despite Peter’s experience and revelation, however, there is
still substantial disagreement over whether Gentiles should or should not be
integrated into the fellowship—and if so how. Luke reports that when some
individuals come down to Antioch from Jerusalem, they teach that unless one was
circumcised, one could not be saved. The
issue is so controversial that eventually a meeting is convened in Jerusalem,
and Paul and Barnabas are among those chosen to attend.
Acts 10:10-11 |
The Jerusalem Council was a very contentious meeting, with
both sides presenting their positions with passion. The issue seemed destined for deadlock until
an unlikely ally rises to speak for Paul. With his Gentile Pentecost experience no doubt still fresh in his memory, Peter
vouches for the Apostle to the Gentiles. He speaks eloquently about his own
experience. His argument against
circumcision essentially boils down to, “We can’t expect them to live up to something
that none of us have ever been able to live up to.”
The words of the one Jesus called, The Rock, seem to have impact on the others, and perhaps help to
break the impasse over this issue. James,
the leader of the Apostles, agrees to let Paul and Barnabas tell their story to
the whole council—previously they have shared it only with a select few.
Eventually a compromise was reached and the
"conservatives" agreed that circumcision would not be required for
Gentile converts. Luke reports that the letter sent to the Church at Antioch
included a phrase: "It seemed good to us and to the Holy Spirit"
There's evidence to suggest the issue of "what to do
with Gentiles" was far from settled when the delegation left Jerusalem. According to Paul, the issue led him to a
public confrontation with Peter—Galatians
2:11-14. Paul and his longtime friend and mentor Barnabas eventually decided
to go their separate ways, possibly due to Paul’s lingering hard feelings over
this issue.
Nevertheless, at
Jerusalem, we get this sense that the Spirit was allowed to be a part of this
conversation, and the result is that the participants were able to find a
solution that seemed "good"
to all parties involved. In essence, the agreement reached was that if the
churches outside Jerusalem would help support the struggling church in
Jerusalem, then the Gentiles did not need to be circumcised. It seems to have been a win-win for both sides.
What’s our Jerusalem Council debate today? We could easily compile a list of similar
"hot button" issues that divide Christians in the early 21st
century, issues that seem to us every bit as thorny as the "Gentile
inclusion" debate in the Early Church. We could extend the conversation to the larger
world around us where society faces a host of vexing and complex questions that
try as we might, defy simple, one-size-fits-all solutions.
When these issues arise—and they inevitably will—we would do
well to remember the example and wisdom of the Jerusalem council in Acts 15. We shouldn't be so bound and
determined to preserve an illusion of unity
among believers that we are afraid to admit that there are issues on which
people of faith hold differing views. No, we've got to allow ourselves to engage in dialogue and wrestle with
"tough" issues, just as the Apostles did in Jerusalem.
Unity doesn't require
uniformity; in fact, diversity, handled well, actually helps to deepen our sense of unity and opens up
new ways of experiencing God.
Our true unity as
followers of Jesus is based upon our mutual love for God. The cords of divine
love that bind us ALL together as believers should be stronger than any human issue that
divides us. That love should be enough to sustain us even when we engage in
contentious debate over these divisive issues.
We should be willing to trust one another even when we
disagree with each other. We should respect our brothers and sisters in Christ
even if we don't fully understand their point of view—we should be slow to
judge others and open to what someone different from us can teach us about God.
(It seems that was true of the in the case of Peter and Paul; Paul clearly
showed respect and reverence for Peter even though they vehemently disagreed on
some issues—and vice versa.) Most of all, we should trust in God’s power, a different kind of power that
surpasses our limited human perspective, sees the complete picture—the Kingdom
perspective if you will—and is the world’s best hope for finding answers.
If we can manage to
lay aside our personal stake in these issues (the outcome we want/desire) and
instead put our trust in God’s power and kingdom perspective (what God
wants/desires), we may just find answers to some of the harder questions that,
up until now, have eluded us. We too might discern a way forward that leads us
toward a hopeful future that seems: "good
to all of us and to the Holy Spirit."
Lord, let it be so!
No comments:
Post a Comment